Metrics and Targets
E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
For setting our climate strategy targets, we follow the SBTi guidance to be aligned with the 1.5°C pathway. Accordingly, offsets and avoided emissions do not count toward our science-based targets. In addition, the following assumptions were applied:
We calculated the absolute reduction needed based on a defined business growth assumption and corresponding production forecasts (aligned with the business growth assumptions used in the already presented scenario analysis).
We made assumptions on how our main sourcing countries will evolve in the coming years, supplemented by insights derived from a third-party study on the development of the energy grid.
We also consulted suppliers to validate our climate strategy as well as to increase their commitments and engagement. We monitor the effectiveness of these actions by tracking and reporting applicable milestones.
In addition to mitigation, we implement ongoing adaptation measures that address physical climate risks, as outlined in the SBM-3 Resilience Analysis table. While adidas has not set specific adaptation targets, these measures contribute to strengthening resilience across our operations and supply chain.
For further details on our GHG emissions accounting and target-setting approach: See ESRS E1-6 – Gross Scope 1, 2, 3, and total ghg emissions
For a detailed description of our climate strategy levers and actions SEE ESRS E1-1 – TRANSITION PLAN FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION SEE ESRS E1-3 – ACTIONS AND RESOURCES IN RELATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES
Scope |
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
Baseline4 |
|
Change vs. baseline |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions |
|
By 2030, reduction of 70% from the 2022 baseline |
|
127,983 |
|
135,814 |
|
164,149 |
|
(22%) |
||||||||||||||
Scope 3 GHG emissions |
|
By 2030, reduction of 42% from the 2022 baseline |
|
6,236,869 |
|
5,248,523 |
|
6,578,270 |
|
(5%) |
||||||||||||||
Scope 1 to 3 GHG emissions per product |
|
By 2025, reduction of 9% from the 2022 baseline |
|
5.87 |
|
6.11 |
|
6.45 |
|
(9%) |
||||||||||||||
Scope 1 to 3 GHG emissions |
|
By 2050, achieve net-zero GHG emissions across our value chain6 |
|
6,364,851 |
|
5,384,337 |
|
6,742,419 |
|
(6%) |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
We met our 2025 target and achieved a 9% reduction in Scope 1-3 product carbon intensity (baseline 2022). This outcome is driven by the implementation of decarbonization measures across the value chain and our ongoing effort to decouple emissions intensity from business growth.
Progress during the year was supported by delivery against key mitigation levers, including significant advances in phasing out coal from our suppliers, where feasible, increasing the use of renewable electricity across our own operations and supply chain, and continuing to scale lower‑carbon materials.
adidas remains committed to advancing its climate change mitigation actions and long-term decarbonization ambition. The company will monitor evolving market, technological, and regulatory developments along the entire value chain to support measurable progress and ensure our transition approach remains informed and responsive over time.
E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
Baseline2 |
|
Change vs. baseline |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fossil energy source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Fossil electricity |
|
202,263 |
|
244,741 |
|
291,377 |
|
|
||||||||
Natural gas |
|
66,612 |
|
63,993 |
|
59,834 |
|
|
||||||||
Heating oil |
|
4,292 |
|
4,322 |
|
4,391 |
|
|
||||||||
Diesel (emergency generator) |
|
264 |
|
360 |
|
371 |
|
|
||||||||
District heating |
|
9,419 |
|
25,655 |
|
26,652 |
|
|
||||||||
Diesel (company vehicles) |
|
9,320 |
|
10,434 |
|
16,034 |
|
|
||||||||
Gasoline/petrol (company vehicles |
|
14,375 |
|
15,179 |
|
16,503 |
|
|
||||||||
Nuclear sources3 |
|
17,904 |
|
40,529 |
|
— |
|
|
||||||||
Total fossil energy consumption |
|
324,449 |
|
405,213 |
|
415,162 |
|
(22%) |
||||||||
Renewable energy source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Wood chips for combustion (heating) |
|
41 |
|
43 |
|
38 |
|
|
||||||||
Green electricity bundled |
|
5,876 |
|
5,296 |
|
65,226 |
|
|
||||||||
Green electricity from VPPAs |
|
32,612 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
||||||||
Green electricity unbundled |
|
115,216 |
|
77,575 |
|
11,388 |
|
|
||||||||
Green gas |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10,327 |
|
|
||||||||
Green district heating |
|
18,934 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
||||||||
On-site solar PV consumption from self-generation |
|
11,158 |
|
9,152 |
|
8,398 |
|
|
||||||||
Total renewable energy consumption |
|
183,837 |
|
92,066 |
|
95,377 |
|
93% |
||||||||
Total energy consumption |
|
508,286 |
|
497,278 |
|
510,539 |
|
(0.4%) |
||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Through solar PV plants on our facilities’ rooftops, we produced a total of 15,751 MWh of electricity in 2025 (2024: 13,683 MWh). Of this amount, 11,158 MWh were directly used by our own sites (2024: 9,152 MWh), and 4,593 MWh were supplied into the public power grid (2024: 4,530 MWh).
adidas is part of the high-climate-impact sectors of ‘manufacturing’ (textile and apparel, leather, and footwear products) and ‘wholesale and retail trade.’ While we do not have significant own manufacturing activities, our business model is based on the sourcing, distribution, and selling of finished goods produced by independent, third-party suppliers. In that regard, the net revenue related to high-climate-impact sector activities is equal to our net sales presented in the consolidated income statement.
E1-6 – Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions
|
|
Retrospective |
|
Milestones and climate strategy target years |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
Change |
|
Baseline |
|
Change vs. baseline |
|
2025 |
|
2030 |
|
2050 |
|
Annual % target/ |
||||||||||||
Scope 1 emissions (in tons CO2e) |
|
20,839 |
|
20,844 |
|
—% |
|
21,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Scope 2 emissions, market-based (in tons CO2e) |
|
107,143 |
|
114,970 |
|
(7%) |
|
142,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Administrative offices |
|
13,843 |
|
21,301 |
|
(35%) |
|
13,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Distribution centers |
|
5,222 |
|
18,994 |
|
(73%) |
|
21,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Own retail stores |
|
87,432 |
|
72,890 |
|
20% |
|
104,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Showrooms |
|
646 |
|
1,785 |
|
(64%) |
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Scope 2 emissions, location-based (in tons CO2e) |
|
166,752 |
|
164,079 |
|
2% |
|
164,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Administrative offices |
|
25,461 |
|
25,069 |
|
2% |
|
24,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Distribution centers |
|
25,752 |
|
25,911 |
|
(1%) |
|
28,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Own retail stores |
|
114,021 |
|
111,287 |
|
2% |
|
108,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Showrooms |
|
1,518 |
|
1,812 |
|
(16%) |
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Scope 1 and 2 emissions, market-based (in tons CO2e) |
|
127,983 |
|
135,814 |
|
(6%) |
|
164,149 |
|
(22%) |
|
|
|
(70%) |
|
|
|
(9%) |
||||||||||||
Scope 1 and 2 emissions, location-based (in tons CO2e) |
|
187,591 |
|
184,923 |
|
1% |
|
186,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Scope 3 emissions (in tons CO2e) |
|
6,236,869 |
|
5,248,523 |
|
19% |
|
6,578,269 |
|
(5%) |
|
|
|
(42%) |
|
|
|
(5%) |
||||||||||||
Purchased goods and services |
|
5,618,143 |
|
4,710,261 |
|
19% |
|
6,041,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Upstream transportation and distribution |
|
383,810 |
|
316,684 |
|
21% |
|
343,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Business travel |
|
63,092 |
|
66,332 |
|
(5%) |
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Use of sold products2 |
|
1,128,317 |
|
994,948 |
|
13% |
|
1,057,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
End-of-life treatment of sold products |
|
171,823 |
|
155,246 |
|
11% |
|
157,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total emissions without use of sold products (market-based in tons CO2e) |
|
6,364,851 |
|
5,384,337 |
|
18% |
|
6,742,418 |
|
(6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net-zero3 |
|
(3%)4 |
||||||||||||
Total emissions without use of sold products (location-based in tons CO2e) |
|
6,424,460 |
|
5,433,446 |
|
18% |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Carbon intensity (in kg CO2e)5 |
|
5.87 |
|
6.11 |
|
(3.9%) |
|
6.45 |
|
(9%) |
|
(9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
(3%) |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Explanatory notes to our reported gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions
Our GHG emissions are reported in alignment with the methodologies provided by the GHG Protocol and the requirements laid out by ESRS E1-6.
In the reporting year, there were no significant changes in connection with our value chain or scope of consolidation that would result in a change to the methodology used to present past progress in meeting our climate strategy targets. SEE ESRS E1-1 – TRANSITION PLAN FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions relate to our own operations including administrative offices, distribution centers, production sites, and own retail stores. The emissions are calculated based on 78% of reported environmental quantities (primary data) in our own operations’ the Health and Safety, Environment, and Energy (HSEE) data collection systems. The calculation for the remaining 22% uses estimations by scaling up the primary data collected at the facility or site level to a company-wide level on the basis of gross lease area (in m3). In 2025, our market-based electricity emissions were accounted through the use of contractual instruments. The share of purchased or acquired electricity compared to the overall electricity was as follows: 2% for green tariffs, 31% for unbundled energy attribute certificates, and 9% for VPPA in Europe. In addition, we apply emission factors from different sources in our calculation. For Scope 1 GHG emissions, we use emission factors published by the GHG Protocol, for Scope 2, we use emission factors from the International Energy Agency (IEA) related to emissions from electricity, and from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) related to emissions from district heating.
Scope 3 GHG emissions relate to certain upstream and downstream value chain categories, which are significant due to their magnitude (see below). Wherever available, adidas uses primary data in the calculations (examples of primary data used include the annual material consumption, annual sales volumes, energy consumption of key suppliers, and shipping data for inbound logistics). Collected primary data are complemented by and matched with life cycle assessment (LCA) data in a tool specifically developed for calculating GHG emissions. In addition, emission factors from different sources are used such as DEFRA, IEA and the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR).
Scope 3 GHG emissions include the following significant categories:
Purchased goods and services: This category considers the production and processing of raw materials, for which impacts are estimated based on quantities of materials and life-cycle analysis data. The reporting-year values cover production seasons SS25 and FW25. All key production processes are factored in. Primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging-material quantities are also included. The quantities are estimated based on sales volumes, using composition and weight assumptions from the PEFCR. Furthermore, this category also considers the assembly phase, for which impacts are estimated by applying emission factors to reported energy consumption from Tier 1 strategic suppliers. Sourcing volume data is used to estimate the impact of non-strategic suppliers (< 20%).
Upstream transportation and distribution: This category considers inbound and outbound transportation of products. For calculating GHG emissions, quantities of shipped products for specified distribution routes are combined with transport emission factors.
Business travel: This category includes emissions from air travel by adidas employees. Emission calculations are based on the business-travel data system.
Use of sold products: This category relates to emissions caused by washing, drying, and ironing of sold products throughout their lifetime. The calculation is based on average care-cycle data from PEFCR and life-cycle analysis datasets. In line with our SBTi-validated targets, we exclude Scope 3 GHG emissions from the use of sold products in our total (Scope 1-3) GHG emissions calculation.
End-of-life treatment of sold products: This category relates to emissions caused by the disposal of sold products, and the calculation uses estimates based on sales volumes and typical waste disposal routes (e.g., landfill and incineration).
Scope 3 GHG emissions related to the following categories are considered insignificant for adidas based on their estimated magnitude and/or other GHG Protocol and ISO criteria. Accordingly, these categories are excluded from the reported data: Capital goods, Fuel- and energy-related activities, Waste generated in operations, Employee commuting, Upstream leased assets, Downstream transportation, Processing of sold products, Downstream leased assets, Franchises, and Investments.
The percentage of Scope 3 emissions calculated using primary data is determined based on the share of emissions for which adidas uses company- or supplier-specific activity data, such as material consumption, energy consumption, transport weights, travel activity, and sales volumes. Where such activity data is combined with emission factors from LCA databases, adidas distinguishes between the origin of activity data and the source of emission factors: the activity data is classified as primary, while the emission factors are treated as secondary inputs used to convert activity data into CO2e emissions. The resulting emission figures from this combination are classified as being calculated from ‘primary data’. In categories where both primary and secondary activity data are used, conservative weighting assumptions are applied. Applying this approach results in 85.5% of Scope 3 emissions being calculated using primary data.
adidas has no Scope 1 GHG emissions related to regulated emissions-trading schemes.
adidas discloses Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions related to the financial reporting scope as outlined in Principles of Consolidation Note 02 in this report. GHG Emissions as described in ESRS E1-6 50.b do not apply. SEE NOTE 02
Biogenic emissions in Scope 1-3 are not reported separately due to immateriality.
E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
adidas has no GHG removal or storage initiatives in place and does not plan to implement any in the mid-term future. In addition, adidas neither purchases nor plans to purchase carbon credits in the foreseeable future to support its climate strategy or to account for them in its GHG emission calculation.
Our climate strategy details our actions and targets to reduce future GHG emissions, which are aligned with the 1.5°C pathway and contribute to a net-zero future. As per the SBTi guideline, we will only consider the purchase and retirement of carbon credits in the long term (including the applicable methodology and framework) to neutralize any potential residual GHG emissions for which reduction actions are not viable (with a maximum of 10% against the baseline year 2022).
E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing
In order to achieve the targets of the adidas climate strategy, the various measures and actions presented earlier are driven along milestones with clearly defined accountabilities. Progress against these milestones is monitored, tracked, and reported regularly to ensure the timely and effective execution. Moreover, embedding the carbon intensity target into the Executive Board’s LTIP serves as an additional steering instrument to ensure that the impact on our climate strategy is a relevant factor in our decision-making (e.g., material selection, investment in renewable energy). We are confident that this approach is sufficient for implementing the needed actions. Accordingly, we do not consider the introduction of an internal carbon-pricing scheme to add value to the execution of the adidas climate strategy at this point in time.